Search for: "US v. Fitch" Results 101 - 120 of 249
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2014, 3:25 am by Amy Howe
Finance) previews EEOC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:49 am by Amy Howe
A friendly reminder:  We rely on our readers to send us links for the round-up. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 10:00 am
That’s why the Supreme Court recently ruled in Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:56 am by Timothy P. Flynn
In EEOC v Abercrombie & Fitch, the High Court reversed a 10th Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling that favored an employer's right to uphold a corporate dress code; in this case, it was Abercrombie's "no head wear" policy.The case involves the intersection of fashion, commerce and the freedom of religious expression under the First Amendment. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 4:19 am
The Supreme Court oral argument in EEOC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:37 am by Christopher Spizzirri
Abercrombie & Fitch, defense counsel argued unpersuasively that the defense had no obligation to search for or locate known documents that did not turn up using the parties' agreed-upon search terms. 2010 U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
A friendly reminder:  We rely on our readers to send us links for the round-up. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 7:29 am by Richard Hunt
Abercrombie & Fitch Co., 765 F.3d 1205 (10th Cir. 2014), U.S. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 1:15 am by Sophie Corke
 KatFriend Hans Eriksson  discussed the issues arising in relation to the application of Article 7(1)(e)(iii) of Regulation 2017/1001 (EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR)) to a pillow design dispute.OtherPermaKat Eleonora Rosati gave an overview of the approach of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) to website blocking under the Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) freedom of expression right in Vladimir Kharitonov v Russia.Finally, readers… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:17 am by Amy Howe
A friendly reminder:  We rely on our readers to send us links for the round-up. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:30 pm
 Marshall also considered Levi Strauss v Abercrombie & Fitch and the degree of similarity which was needed in order to establish confusion. [read post]