Search for: "US v. Jimenez" Results 101 - 120 of 173
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2007, 2:10 am
Jimenez "If a single juror finds defendant has met his burden of proving mental retardation by a preponderance of the evidence, he is not eligible for a penalty of death. [read post]
25 May 2008, 10:16 pm
Jimenez, 513 F.3d 62, 77-80 (3d Cir. 2008) (holding as harmless error the admission of and reliance on 902(11) certifications and other statutory IRS certifications of tax records); United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:02 am
The eighth case granted Monday — Jimenez v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  This one gets less play than the others – perhaps because of how courts sometimes use “communication” to get around it in non-prescription medical product cases (more on that to come), or sometimes because plaintiffs might use the same testimony to claim medical malpractice.But prescriber failure to read can be a powerful tool. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:36 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/823979.no1.pdf State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 8:39 am by The Charge
Jimenez Recio, the Court reaffirmed that the essence of conspiracy is the agreement. [read post]
20 May 2009, 12:28 pm
Judge Rothenberg tosses us a bone. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 9:24 am
 In Australia they use a different non-proprietary name. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
That brings us to our last really new relist. [read post]