Search for: "US v. Laurent" Results 101 - 120 of 126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am by Marie Louise
No. 337-TA-755) (ITC Law Blog) US Copyright US provides misleading answer to WIPO questionnaire on export of accessible works under US law (Knowledge Ecology International) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeals 11th Circuit: Saregama’s lack of standing to sue: Saregama India Ltd v Timothy Mosley (Spicy IP) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Kanye West wins copyright battle – N D Illinois grants motion to… [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:24 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
He asks whether treating IP rights as property might offer answers as to how to limit their scope.In Chapter 7, Laurent Manderieux reviews the intersections between IP and administrative law. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm by Connie Gibilaro
But the United States Supreme Court held in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:31 am by Ted Max and Chidera Anyanwu
If your company aims to create or use such a CGI model or influencer, you should follow the Guidelines and provide proper disclosures as if the model was, in fact, human. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:31 am by Ted Max and Chidera Anyanwu
If your company aims to create or use such a CGI model or influencer, you should follow the Guidelines and provide proper disclosures as if the model was, in fact, human. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:59 pm by Ted Max and Chidera Anyanwu
If your company aims to create or use such a CGI model or influencer, you should follow the Guidelines and provide proper disclosures as if the model was, in fact, human. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:59 pm by Ted Max and Chidera Anyanwu
If your company aims to create or use such a CGI model or influencer, you should follow the Guidelines and provide proper disclosures as if the model was, in fact, human. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:59 pm by Ted Max and Chidera Anyanwu
If your company aims to create or use such a CGI model or influencer, you should follow the Guidelines and provide proper disclosures as if the model was, in fact, human. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:31 am by Ted Max and Chidera Anyanwu
If your company aims to create or use such a CGI model or influencer, you should follow the Guidelines and provide proper disclosures as if the model was, in fact, human. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:21 pm by Cary Coglianese
Her innovative case study on the Microsoft v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” In Time, Olivier Laurent offers a behind-the-scenes look at the photo shoot for the justices’ latest official photograph. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
m; (d) at least one dispersing agent; and meeting the following conditions: (1) the percentage in weight of water based on the combined weight of the cement (a) and of the particles (c) lies within the 8-24% range; (2) the metal fibres have an average length l1 of at least 2 mm and an l1/Ø1 ratio of at least 20, Ø1 being the diameter of the fibres; (3) the ratio, V1/V, of the volume V1 of the metal fibres to the volume V of the organic fibres is greater than 1 and the… [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:06 am by Dan Markel
Levine) Jenia Iontcheva Turner – Effective Remedies for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: A New Look After Lafler v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:05 pm
 From the Land of the Glens comes the judgment of the Glennie in the form of Schuh Limited v Shhh... [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:06 am by Dan Markel
Armstrong (Loyola University, New Orleans) Policing Identity *Wayne Logan (Florida State University) Guilt and the Fourth Amendment *Laurent Sacharoff (University of Arkansas) Judicial Response or Litigant Strategy: Examining the Success of the U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:21 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Corcoran on the merits, or whether – using the EBA’s words – “unsubstantiated or groundless, made-up allegations were used as a pretext for getting rid of an irksome judge”. [read post]