Search for: "US v. Laurent"
Results 101 - 120
of 127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2011, 12:29 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm
The Court reminds that lending does not have a direct or indirect economic or commercial character: “In those circumstances, the use of a protected work in the event of public lending cannot be assessed in the light of its value in trade. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
Following the court filing, Yves Saint Laurent hit back arguing that Louboutin had no monopoly over the red-colored shoe soles and that similar applications were commonplace before Louboutin's use (picture, left - a Louboutin). [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:31 am
Yves Saint Laurent America Inc., 11-2381, U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:41 pm
The Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am
Please feel free to let either of us know in advance if you and others may be coming. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:56 am
” The Apple v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
Antonious v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 6:41 pm
Women’s shoe designer Christian Louboutin has sued designer Yves Saint Laurent in the Southern District of New York over the latter’s use of red soles on its women’s shoes. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:12 pm
In Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 8:14 am
Christian Louboutin recently filed suit (copy of complaint below) in federal court in Manhattan against Yves Saint Laurent over their use of red soled heels. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
No. 337-TA-755) (ITC Law Blog) US Copyright US provides misleading answer to WIPO questionnaire on export of accessible works under US law (Knowledge Ecology International) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeals 11th Circuit: Saregama’s lack of standing to sue: Saregama India Ltd v Timothy Mosley (Spicy IP) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Kanye West wins copyright battle – N D Illinois grants motion to… [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
Louboutin's complaint argues that Yves Saint Laurent's use of the red sole is "likely to cause and is causing confusion, mistake and deception among the relevant purchasing public. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 8:20 pm
(Christian Louboutin SA v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
(IPBiz) US Patents USPTO extends deadline for Patent Application Exchange Program (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: In an ‘exceptional’ case, court orders production of negotiations leading to license agreements: Clear with Computers, LLC v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 7:09 am
Here is the abstract: Miranda v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:01 pm
V. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
m; (d) at least one dispersing agent; and meeting the following conditions: (1) the percentage in weight of water based on the combined weight of the cement (a) and of the particles (c) lies within the 8-24% range; (2) the metal fibres have an average length l1 of at least 2 mm and an l1/Ø1 ratio of at least 20, Ø1 being the diameter of the fibres; (3) the ratio, V1/V, of the volume V1 of the metal fibres to the volume V of the organic fibres is greater than 1 and the… [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 9:09 am
Laurent, 2010 U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:05 am
Del Fabbro Laurent, D2004-0481 (WIPO August 20, 2004); Volvo Trademark Holding AB v. [read post]
