Search for: "US v. Love" Results 101 - 120 of 9,361
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
It is now subject to the same test that Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart once used to identify pornography in the case Jacobellis v. [read post]
Deepfakes, such as the voice cloning of loved ones and celebrities, can pose risks when implemented through communications or marketing efforts. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:36 am by Guest Author
” Justice Stevens used very similar language to both those quoted phrases in his fifth draft. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 10:54 am
 For us we could say it was the opinion in Wickard v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While Adkins was important in the development of American feminisms, however, the case tells us very little about the [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:02 am by Reference Staff
” The US Supreme Court opined about the lack of jury diversity as early as 1940 in Smith v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am by SHG
And don’t get me started on the Reasonably Scared Cop Rule of Graham v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
Below are a series of output images generated by the author, using DreamUp, beginning with entering the text prompt, “painting of the Brooklyn Bridge in winter,” which generated a perfectly lovely, snowy scene reminiscent of the style of digital art often generated by AI prompts. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Amazon is used for more product search than Google. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Use expressio unis to get at the fact that the noncommercial use holding is limited to situations where the challenged use is “used as a mark for a commercial product”; the term noncommercial use can reasonably include uses as a mark for political speech—Robert Kennedy, Jr., is using his father’s famous name to promote himself politically (also highlighting the importance of small differences when it comes to… [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:13 am by Laura
  The recent case of F v M [2021] EWFC 4 provided a helpful definition of controlling and coercive behaviour. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 8:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
The chapter’s compelling arguments for legal refinements will also be of use, however, to readers who wish to identify possible improvements to Chinese law. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm by Daphne Keller
I actually love Denver Area, but an outcome like that in NetChoice would be rough. [read post]