Search for: "US v. Luna"
Results 101 - 120
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2010, 4:30 am
Plaintiff has never authorized Defendants to use the MAFIA WARS mark, sell Virtual Goods for use in the Game, or transfer Virtual Goods that Defendants have “sold” to players through the Infringing Websites.Zynga Game Network Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm
On reflection: Dietemann v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:24 pm
Snyder v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 8:12 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit tackled self-execution of 1958 Convention Article 6—curtailing jurisdiction over foreign vessels in international waters—in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am
Luna, 14-1143, probably continues to lead the league with five relists. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 4:34 am
Luna, 577 U.S. 7, 11 (2015). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Whether you’re here in person or participating virtually from around the country, or even overseas, I thank you for joining us. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:16 am
Because trial counsel failed to provide the necessary notice regarding use of an expert, he was precluded from calling Shaw’s treating psychiatrist. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 2:45 pm
Luna, I. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:23 pm
Luna: Lethal force case. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 3:29 am
Luna, the court had made no mention of that subject at the sentencing hearing, but imposed them in the journal entry. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Luna 14-1143Issue: (1) Whether, when viewing the facts from the perspective of an officer who fired his service rifle at a vehicle involved in a high-speed chase, the officer acted reasonably under the Fourth Amendment when an officer in his situation would believe that the suspect posed a risk of serious harm to other officers or members of the public; and (2) whether the law clearly established that this use of potentially deadly force was unlawful when existing precedent did… [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 4:44 am
The invasion of privacy is the same regardless of the mechanism used. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 2:51 pm
The Court of Appeal agreed with HHJ Luna QC. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
In Mullenix v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 2:49 am
It's attributable to the ongoing Epic Games v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 2:06 pm
The recent decision by the Federal Court of Appeals in the case of Procopio v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
Luna 14-1143Issue: (1) Whether, when viewing the facts from the perspective of an officer who fired his service rifle at a vehicle involved in a high-speed chase, the officer acted reasonably under the Fourth Amendment when an officer in his situation would believe that the suspect posed a risk of serious harm to other officers or members of the public; and (2) whether the law clearly established that this use of potentially deadly force was unlawful when existing precedent did… [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
Baker v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
Luna, 14-1143, which notched its sixth relist. [read post]
