Search for: "US v. Mark Lambert" Results 101 - 120 of 144
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2012, 10:00 pm by Jim Hassett
  Most law firms use Microsoft Office as their "wheelhouse" technology for creating and editing documents and use Outlook for e-mail, calendars, and meeting scheduling. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am by Conor McEvily
At PrawfsBlawg, Mark Kende discusses Justice Breyer’s “democratic pragmatis[m]. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
Lambert Docket: 11-38 Issue: Did the Third Circuit fail to properly apply the habeas deference standard to the state court’s rejection of respondent’s Brady claim? [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am by Joshua Matz
Sunday marked Justice Thomas’s twentieth year on the Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
Giving the Opinion of the Court, Judge Jordan stated that it was obvious that the false advertising dispute was a "proxy for the real fight the parties want to have" over the right to the exclusive use of the HAVANA CLUB mark. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm by Bexis
Warner–Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2007), presumed to know more about Michigan law than either the Michigan courts (Taylor v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:08 pm by Betsy McKenzie
There are several bloggers who are attending who can be expected to blog and Twitter a good bit during the event: Mark Estes, Greg Lambert, John Mayer and Rich Leiter all blog and Twitter, and we can hope will be actively reporting live during the Colloquium. 2. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm by Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C.
Johns’ use and maintenance of the property, it cannot be inferred or implied that they consented to the construction of the St. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:07 am
An early example of the Great British double entendre Zoe Renault v Renault Zoe. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 12:41 pm by Simon Chester
But it’s likely not the old Eagan v. [read post]