Search for: "US v. McGuire" Results 101 - 120 of 232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
In previous posts, such as The Problem with Income Tax Vehicle Credits, Congressional Mis-delegation Endangers Tax Collections, and More Criticism of Non-Tax Tax Credits, and When Tax Credits Aren’t Worth the Trouble, I have shared a variety of reasons that it makes little or no sense to use the tax law as a substitute for direct funding and oversight by the agencies expertised in the area in question.In McGuire v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:28 pm by Patricia Salkin
Barton v City of Norwalk, 2017 WL 2806277 (CT 7/4/2017)Filed under: Condemnation/Eminent Domain, Uncategorized [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:31 pm
Court" and then published this analysis: REST BREAK AND MEAL PERIOD CLAIMS AFTER MURPHY V. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:43 am
Although the Appellate Division noted that Garnes "was terminable without a hearing and without a statement of the reason for his dismissal," the court, citing York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760 and Matter of Johnson v Kelly, 33 AD3d 297, said that Garnes failed to demonstrate that his termination was made in bad faith, was unlawful, or was for an impermissible reason. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 3:27 pm by Asude Sena Moya
 Book ReviewAnastasiia Kyrylenko reviewed the book “Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Rights and Arbitration,” edited by Simon Klopschinski and Mary-Rosy McGuire (Edward Elgar, 2024). [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 8:01 am
and Hull McGuire love humans and therefore love all jurors (except for The-Morally-Certain and, of course, some Duke grads and most engineers). [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 6:10 pm by Jeff Gamso
McGuire, supra, recently eliminated consideration of residual doubt during the sentencing phase of the trial by overruling State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
McGuire, Civil Action No. 07-CV-4779-JMR/FLN (D.Minn. 2007) and SEC Litigation Release No. 20387 (Dec. 6, 2007) (option backdating); SEC v. [read post]