Search for: "US v. McKenzie" Results 101 - 120 of 232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2017, 2:57 am
The well-known High Court judge, who took the audience carefully through various key cases on the topic (such as the CJEU Lindt case (C-529/07) and the Redbull v Sun Mark case ([2012] EWHC 1929 (Ch)), focussed specifically on the link between intention to use and the requirement for the EUTM holder not to register the trade mark in ‘bad faith. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
The complaint alleged that the tenants had stopped using the property and had sublet it or assigned the lease to third parties in violation of the no-sublet and no-assignment clauses in the lease. [read post]
23 May 2014, 10:24 am
The increase in penalty means the maximum is higher in Canada than it is in the U.S. or U.K.In the trial decision in R. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 2:05 pm by Giles Peaker
Ms K’s argument was that, as per Lewisham LBC v Malcolm (2008) UKHL 43, the court cannot be expected to give legal effect to an unlawful act. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:32 am by INFORRM
  Please let us know if there are other cases and jurisdictions which we should be covering. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 12:53 am
Supreme Court vacated the 2nd Circuit's ruling and instructed it to reconsider in light of its decision in Carey v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by INFORRM
Using funding from a Russian organisation called the Moscow Bureau for Human Rights, Mr Terluk found legal representation for his appeal. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
The businessman sued the broadcaster, Nine and Nick McKenzie, an investigative reporter at the Age and the Sydney Morning Herald, over the joint report. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:34 am by David DePaolo
However, he determined that McIntosh's PTSD was not compensable because her PTSD was not "the natural or unavoidable result" of her minor physical injury under section 440.093(2).McIntosh appealed and the 1st DCA reversed the JCC.Citing McKenzie v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 2:08 am
 The defendant used the claimants brands on its Italian country domain website and, whilst there was no option to order the perfumes, the website included a German language option and contact details. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
He actually said : Regular ill-informed and deliberately partial press commentary must have an impact on the public at large but targeted so-called advice by some semi-professional McKenzie Friends or other lay organisations to vulnerable individuals who find themselves the subject of care proceedings, has the effect in some cases of moving those individuals directly away from engaging effectively in the court process and achieving access to the system, which I believe would respect their… [read post]