Search for: "US v. Watkins"
Results 101 - 120
of 379
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2017, 5:30 am
Latham & Watkins. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 4:04 pm
Watkins Inc., v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 3:07 am
” Briefly: Matthew Watkins of the Texas Tribune covers the university’s filing of its brief on the merits in Fisher v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:35 am
In California v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 9:57 am
Rebekka holds a PhD in Theoretical Physics from the Bonn University.Sven Völcker (Partner, Latham & Watkins):Dr Sven Völcker is a partner in Latham & Watkins' Global Antitrust & Competition Practice. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:24 am
Supreme Court's ruling in Hurst v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 2:13 pm
Book review: You Don’t Own Me: How Mattel v MGA Entertainment Exposed Barbie’s Dark SideThis book, written by Orly Lobel, describes the behind the scenes action of the dispute between Mattel and MGA Entertainment, i.e., Barbie v Bratz. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 6:01 am
On July 2, 2021, the US Supreme Court granted certiorari in Pivotal Software, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 2:07 pm
In State of Tennessee v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 1:15 am
Fitzsimmons, Watkins Glen, for appellant. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:09 am
Co. v Horde (259 Ga. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Watkins Associated Industries (1993) 6 Cal.4th 644, 660-661.) [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm
Watkins Associated Industries (1993) 6 Cal.4th 644, 663; Uzyel v. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 6:35 pm
A federal district judge rejected his claim that this amounted to retaliation for filing certain grievances, but permitted him to proceed with a free exercise challenge to the denial.In Watkins v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:07 am
More on Baze v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 11:31 am
Chellis v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:56 am
Garre, now chair of the appellate practice at Latham & Watkins, in Washington. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
Section 3 cannot be used to deny President Trump access to the ballot V. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am
” At Take Care, Leah Litman and Abigail DeHart argue that “many of the Court’s recent decisions tell us what we need to know [about Trump v. [read post]
