Search for: "US v. William Cross" Results 101 - 120 of 1,133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
  At least that is true, I believe, given how Thomas applied the test in Williams v. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 3:27 pm by Asude Sena Moya
The Court ruled that the use of the bleeding red cross infringed the plaintiff’s well-known trade mark for the Red Cross (Sec. 14(1) sentence 1 no. 3 German Trade Mark Act).CopyrightSöğüt Atilla continued her exploration of the European Copyright Society’s Opinion on Pelham II. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 11:06 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 137998 (SD FL, Aug. 25, 2017), a Florida federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing an inmate's complaint that he was not permitted to keep a chain and cross purchased from a non-approved vendor.In Diaz v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Williams, we posted that the writing was clearly on the wall to the effect that punitive damages had "peaked out" in American law.That conclusion was strongly supported in the US Supreme Court's recent decision in the Exxon Valdez punitive damages case, Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 8:23 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: DANIEL GEORGE SWAN v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:06 pm
On cross-appeals, the Alaska Supreme Court upheld the City's tax in its entirety. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 11:26 am
  “William Lemke, 41, of East Wenatchee, identified himself as the driver of the Toyota Tundra pickup at the scene. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But such claims are, I think, often overstated, and this morning’s ruling in Williams v. [read post]