Search for: "USA v. Certain Land"
Results 101 - 120
of 143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2011, 8:31 am
A company’s provision of stock options to employees was deemed satisfactory consideration for a non-compete agreement in Marsh USA Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:56 am
Summers v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
Development, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
The Council for Public Interest Law set up by the Ford Foundation in USA defined "public interest litigation" in its report of Public Interest Law, USA, 1976 as follows: "Public Interest Law is the name that has recently been given to efforts provide legal representation to previously unrepresented groups and interests. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 9:47 am
Hansen In Vuki v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:16 pm
Oral arguments in USA v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 2:25 am
The event which prompted this comment was the decision of Mr Justice Arnold (Chancery Division, England and Wales) in SAS Institute Inc. v World Programming Limited (noted here by the IPKat) that a series of pretty basic but crucial questions would have to be referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling before the learned judge could get on with his day job of judging the disputes that land up before him. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:00 am
Chevron USA, Inc., No. 2009-CC-2632 (La. 2010). [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, LondonDocket: 09-945Issue(s): Whether Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act is an “Act of Congress” subject to the anti-preemption provision of the McCarran-Ferguson Act.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (5th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replySupplemental brief for petitioner Title: Hogan v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
Children’s lives ruined foreverChild sex Offenders 04YearsOld 05YearsOld 06YearsOld 07YearsOld 08YearsOld 09YearsOld 10YearsOld 11YearsOld 12YearsOld 13YearsOld 14YearsOld 15YearsOld 16YearsOld 17YearsOld 18YearsOld All Child sex Offenders (OffenderChild) Young Lives Destroyed The war on toddlerism 8 year old charged with sexual conduct with sitter Young boy faces rape allegations Evil in the USA - Children's lives ruined forever! [read post]
Interpreting plant provisions of the ESA, 9th Circuit shows restraint, encourages FWS to adopt rules
31 Aug 2010, 5:01 pm
” Steel Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am
If many members of the corporate defense bar get the Court to use this case to grant their fondest wishes for immunity from consumer protection and civil rights laws granted, however, then this case could have the kind of impact on class actions that an asteroid landing in Mexico millions of years ago had on dinosaurs. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:02 pm
Opinion below (5th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s supplemental brief Case involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Title: SKF USA, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
Once implemented, this legislation will ensure that the dominant industrial global food system is anointed as the only legitimate manner of food production and distribution, a deception that amounts to a covert continuation of the Enclosure Movement.[1] Just as the Enclosure acts during the 17th through 19th centuries drove peasants off what was once communal land, the food safety legislation will serve to bar small- and medium-sized business people from engaging in food… [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm
This is why a USA Today editorial argued, “NSA has your phone records; ‘trust us’ isn’t good enough. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
BIC USA, Inc., 136 F.Supp.2d 196, 207-208 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (Consumer Product Safety Commission) (“The CPSC regulations establish general, rudimentary and minimal requirements. [read post]
