Search for: "USA v. Richard Justice"
Results 101 - 120
of 680
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
” Additional coverage comes from Richard Wolf at USA Today and from Robert Barnes and Laura Vozzella for The Washington Post. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:45 am
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[t]he annual listing of investments, liabilities and potential conflicts of interest showed nothing unusual for the nine members of the nation’s highest court, who earn $255,300 (slightly higher for the chief justice). [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:52 am
” Richard Wolf reports for USA Today that “[r]ather than decide the case on ‘an incomplete and misleading record,’ challengers asked the justices to send it back to a lower court for further fact-finding unless they are ready to strike down the citizenship question. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
Briefly: Richard Wolf reports for USA Today that although “[w]hat the public sees of the Supreme Court is mostly above-the-belt – literally and figuratively,” “in [the justices’] written opinions and dissents, things have gotten a bit snippy. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:45 am
Richard Wolf reports for USA Today that “[a] federal judge in New York refused Wednesday to let a late challenge to the Trump administration’s planned 2020 census question on citizenship interfere with the Supreme Court’s upcoming decision. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:59 am
Mazzant III in a case filed by Huawei Technologies, USA. [read post]
23 May 2019, 3:29 am
” Richard Wolf reports for USA Today that in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:12 am
” For USA Today, Richard Wolf describes the other abortion restrictions “pending before or approaching the justices,” noting that “[i]t seems unlikely that the Supreme Court justices will be able to avoid all abortion cases for long – or even until the 2020 presidential election,” but “[t]hat won’t stop them from trying. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:20 pm
Just as one example, in the 1987 case of Florida v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:57 am
” Richard Wolf reports for USA Today that “the court’s four liberal justices were so incensed that they each wrote separate dissents totaling 31 pages. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[t]he Supreme Court generally frowns on drunk or drugged drivers,” but “it also believes that police usually need warrants to conduct searches”; this case “presented the justices with two things they don’t like, and it divided them almost down the middle. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:29 pm
This morning, the justices heard 80 minutes of argument in one of the term’s highest-stakes cases, Department of Commerce v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:18 pm
” Richard Wolf of USA Today has this report. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Additional coverage comes from Richard Wolf for USA Today. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:33 am
For USA Today, Richard Wolf charts the “convoluted decision-making process” behind Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross’ decision to add a question about citizenship to the 2020 census, which sparked a challenge that the justices will consider next week when they hear oral argument in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 9:15 am
Proposals for papers to be presented at the congress should be sent as an email attachment to: richard@serci.org. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:58 am
Oracle USA Inc. and Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:34 am
Briefly: Richard Wolf reports at USA Today that “[t]he conservative takeover of the Supreme Court that was anticipated following President Donald Trump’s two selections has been stalled by a budding bromance between the senior and junior justices,” which “stands in stark contrast to the differences evident to date between Trump’s two nominees”; he notes that “[i]t’s still relatively early in the court’s term,… [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 7:45 pm
” Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court appears wary of taking on federal agencies over regulations. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 2:44 pm
Benisek and Rucho v. [read post]
