Search for: "United States v. Turner" Results 101 - 120 of 628
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which “centers on the federal government taking water developed and stored solely for irrigation uses authorized through the 1905 Klamath Project,” and “to protect the private property rights of farmers and ranchers in the Western states. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 8:28 am by Eric Goldman
The court explains: In many of the United States Supreme Court’s seminal First Amendment decisions, the motives for seeking to curtail or prohibit speech were understandable and could be considered righteous. [read post]
28 May 2020, 11:18 am by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, sec. 4 of the draft Order says that "It is the policy of the United States that large social media platforms, such as Twitter and Facebook, as the functional equivalent of a traditional public forum, should not infringe on protected speech. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
Turner appealed, but a two-judge majority held that there was no jurisdiction over the appeal because of United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” At Reason, Damon Root maintains that, “[a]pplied on its face, the federal prohibition against encouraging illegal immigration for financial gain” at issue in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
Anderson, Rashawn Ray, Nicol Turner Lee and Jon Valent, and will be moderated by Elaine Kamarck. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
My first column was on “The State of Digitization of United Nations Documents” (June 29, 2010), wherein I bemoaned the lack of a “central hub” for online UN documents and publications. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
The United States Supreme Court has endorsed this approach. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm by Gordon Ahl
West and Nicol Turner Lee for a panel discussion. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:17 am
Turner, Hemming Morse LLP, on Thursday, November 14, 2019 Tags: Accounting, Accounting standards, External auditors, GAO, Oversight, PCAOB, Sarbanes–Oxley Act, Securities regulation [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 485 F.2d 1087, 1097 (8th Cir. 1973) (voiding as vague statute punishing "libelous, scurrilous, defamatory words" written on the outside of an envelope"). [read post]