Search for: "United States, et al v. Miles, et al" Results 101 - 120 of 137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2011, 9:25 am by Charon QC
Nearly Legal on No admittance : Sharon Horie v the United Kingdom – 31845/10 [2011] ECHR 289. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:46 am by Michael Sweig, JD
Berryman, et al, 878 F. 2d 786 (4th Cir. 1989), four dissenting judges in an en banc decision found that the Virginia Employment Commission violated the plaintiff’s First Amendment right to free exercise of religion when it denied her unemployment benefits which she sought because she said it was “the right thing to do” for her to follow her religious conviction, and therefore, quit her job to follow her husband’s move 150 miles away from her… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:46 am by Michael Sweig, JD
Berryman, et al, 878 F. 2d 786 (4th Cir. 1989), four dissenting judges in an en banc decision found that the Virginia Employment Commission violated the plaintiff’s First Amendment right to free exercise of religion when it denied her unemployment benefits which she sought because she said it was “the right thing to do” for her to follow her religious conviction, and therefore, quit her job to follow her husband’s move 150 miles away from her… [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm by legalinformatics
Abstract: This essay reads the public controversy surrounding Sonja Sotomayor’s nomination and confirmation to Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 9:04 am
Sánchez de Lozada and Mamani, et al. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Before you issue such a First Amendment-shredding opinion as Holder, et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am by Lawrence Solum
At about 12:40 p.m., Chief Justice Warren began to read his opinion for the Court in Case Number One on that Term’s docket, Oliver Brown et al. v. [read post]