Search for: "United States of Am. v. English"
Results 101 - 120
of 551
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
English v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
English v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 3:16 pm
United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:30 pm
I'm talking English and citing cases and understand precedent and the like, so I am "competent" in a way. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
The first is Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In the oft quoted words of Willes J in East v Holmes ((1858) 1 F&F 347, 349), “If a man wrote that all lawyers were thieves, no particular lawyer could sue him unless there was something to point to the particular individual“ In the leading English case of Knupffer v Express Newspapers ([1944] AC 116) the “Daily Express” published an article referring to “The quislings on whom Hitler flatters himself he can build a pro-German… [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 1:57 pm
Imagine that because there is no absolute exemption clause in the legislation, one can actually submit an information request to the State Intelligence Agency, the financial intelligence unit (PPATK), the Central Bank and even private banks if they are state-funded. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 2:57 pm
On 15 December 2003 the applicants were transferred from a United States detention facility to one run by the United Kingdom authorities (see paragraph 25 above). [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
V. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 5:48 am
The judge also found that there was no evidence to show that Wang did not understand English and therefore did not understand the rights as administered to him since, among other things, he “maintained a Facebook page on which he wrote comments in English and he attended college in the United States. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:53 pm
And those who are intratextually minded are likely to consider the Fourteenth Amendment, which provides:"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 pm
Forum Non Conveniens in US Courts On May 1, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals... [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:27 pm
The United States as amicus curiae suggested a test, see Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 27–29, but Samsung and Apple did not brief the issue. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 1:19 pm
Spam * United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:13 am
Bouzari v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
National Rifle Assn. of Am., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
Thereafter, a three judge Bench of the Supreme Court consisting of Dipak Misra, CJI, AM Khanwailkar & Dr DY Chandrachud, JJ. have decided the issue ("Hardy II") on 25.09.2018 (see here for the decision). [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 3:33 pm
United States English. [read post]
