Search for: "United States v. 23, More or Less, Articles Etc"
Results 101 - 120
of 121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
The three sources of international law are stated and defined in the Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (R3dFRLUS), Section 102. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm
Circuit’s recent decision in Comcast v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:12 pm
Leaving astrophysics for something less cosmic (but more interesting to us baseball fans) the plaintiffs’ experts got to pitch to a Kong Kingman strike zone. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
A wrap-up essay will then focus on some potentially constructive policy reforms that could assist media enterprises without a massive infusion of state support or regulation of the press. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm
It can be inferred that the minimum sell price indicates the point at which any less money received would have less value than the bicycle, and that the maximum buy price indicates the point at which any more money paid would outweigh the value of the bicycle. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 3:50 am
State Bank of India, Bagpat, Distt. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm
(Rees v United Kingdom, para 49; Sheffield and Horsham v United Kingdom, para 66; see also Cossey v United Kingdom, paras 43, 46; I v United Kingdom (GC), para 78; Jaremowicz v Poland, para 48 ('right of a man and a woman to marry')) The historical analysis of the original intent behind Article 12 doesn't help. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
Unlike the products of technological and software companies, the intellectual property rights created by Disney and Marvel are less concrete but more versatile, and decidedly harder to enforce. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Apr. 28, 2009)(Unpub)Affirming JV for fem on her retaliation/discharge etc claim9thCircuitØ Gerving v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:27 am
Personal Vehicles & Congestion Pricing As the rate of vehicle ownership has increased in the United States, so has the amount of miles traveled. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
Austria, Malta and San Marino ban all prisoners serving more than one year. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
[16] Moreover, unlike the theory prevalent in the United States today, the Romans were not concerned with writing down laws for the masses to read for themselves. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
But first, let us take up the fact that he immediately goes on to say that law professors too "are less than scrupulous about acknowledging the provenance of their ideas, because originality is not much prized by law professors either" (pp. 22-23). [read post]
