Search for: "United States v. 6 DEVICES, ETC."
Results 101 - 117
of 117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2010, 4:12 pm
See Slip op. at 5-6. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
This is what is keeping the Federal Communications Commission,[6] the Federal Trade Commission,[7] some in Congress,[8] and many media worrywarts up at night: the fear that, as traditional financing mechanisms falter (advertising, classifieds, subscription revenues, etc.), many traditional news-gathering efforts and institutions will disappear. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
But instead of just taxing “televisions”—which would be very difficult in a world of technological convergence where consumers can “watch television” on any number of devices (PCs, mobile phones, portable gaming devices, portable media players, etc.) [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:32 pm
During the reissue examination, claim 6 was allowed and is not before us. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 9:07 pm
Chakrabarty, supra, at 308, quoting United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 10:51 am
Perkins, 748 F.2d 1519, 1533 (11th Cir.1984); United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 4:07 am
EFFECTIVE DATE: 07/01/20092009 FL H.B. 1385 (NS)March 16, 2009 NEW FDA DECREE COVERS ALL CARDINAL 303 INFUSION PUMPS, United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
Relationship to United States Citizens3. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
United States, 216 F.R.D. 478, 480 (D. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 12:13 am
Built like a tank - almost three pounds v. the usual featherweight disposable pieces of junk bundled with most PCs today. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
Maybe that means that we'll get it right this time.Anyway, as regular readers of this blog know, Wyeth filed its principal merits brief in Wyeth v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:24 am
Turk, 6 Chi. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:50 am
Julie Cohen: Coded v. tacit - not quite clear on the distinctions. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
[16] Moreover, unlike the theory prevalent in the United States today, the Romans were not concerned with writing down laws for the masses to read for themselves. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
It is very rarely permitted, since the American system of justice is premised upon an open system in which, whenever one side wants to communicate with the Court, it has to give prior notice to the other side, so that they too will have an opportunity to be heard.).The "ex parte" order would give the RIAA permission to take "immediate discovery" -- before the defendants have been served or given notice -- which authorizes the issuance of subpoenas to the ISP's asking for the… [read post]
