Search for: "United States v. Bender"
Results 101 - 113
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 9:25 am
It's a 74 page note by Anne Gilson LaLonde on the protection in the United States of foreign trade marks that are well known in the US but aren't actually being used there. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:11 am
Bender Shipbuilding & Repair Co., 27 F.3d 426, 430 (9th Cir. 1994), in which the 9th Circuit states that nothing in Miles’ reasoning suggests that the decision turned upon the identity of the defendant. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 3:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 3:18 am
United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926). [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 1:21 am
The suit, Byers v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 4:58 am
§ 287.8(b)(2), and that was a separate basis for suppression: If the immigration officer has a reasonable suspicion, based on specific articulable facts, that the person being questioned is, or is attempting to be, engaged in an offense against the United States or is an alien illegally in the United States, the immigration officer may briefly detain the person for questioning. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 1:08 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Immigration LawAlien Not 'Found In' U.S.; Not Present When Indicted, Whereabouts Unknown; Indictment Insufficient United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 10:35 pm
In the 2nd Circuit case of Matthew Bender and Company v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 10:36 pm
Bender v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 6:02 pm
In response to an inquiry about wellness program that gave non-smoking employees substantial reductions on the health insurance premiums, the E.E.O.C. stated, "It could be argued that providing a monetary incentive to successfully participate renders the program involuntary because the size of the payment must be considered. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 1:16 pm
Two recent opinions illustrate the problems that America's mobility poses states and localities in raising tax revenue.In Antzis v. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:25 pm
App. 558, 559-60 (1986); United Motor Freight Terminal Company Inc. v. [read post]
