Search for: "United States v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 101 - 120
of 211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2008, 6:17 pm
" Supreme Court of California, July 28, 2008 People v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 4:37 pm
San Diego Assn. of Governments (2017) 3 Cal.5th 497, 506.) [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:36 am
California v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 7:00 am
City of San Diego 176 Cal. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 7:00 am
City of San Diego 176 Cal. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm
Berkeley City Council (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 768, 776; Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 5:45 pm
(See e.g., Building Industry Assoc. of San Diego, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
City of San Diego, S238563. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm
The Court also allowed the government seven days to pursue its remedies to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm
The Court also allowed the government seven days to pursue its remedies to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:20 am
(People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:53 pm
City of San Diego (2011 Cal. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:41 pm
Relatedly, Home Builders Ass’n of Northern California v. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 8:29 pm
In any given instance when canine force is used for criminal apprehension, there is the potential for a violation of the individual’s fourth amendment rights as specified in the United States Constitution. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:10 am
See, California Native Plant Society v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:09 am
I know there is one in Atlanta, Charleston, Chicago, Dallas, Humboldt (California), Knoxville, Los Angles, Oakland, Portland, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, Santa Fe. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
’” The examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused to register the proposed mark on the ground the phrase falsely suggests a connection with a person (here Donald Trump) in violation of Lanham Act Section 2(a), and also because this mark violates Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Supp. 301, 315 (D.N.J. 1995) ("municipalities may assert claims against the creating state under the Supremacy Clause"); San Diego Unified Port District v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 8:16 am
I don’t know what part of the State Don H is in but we went to small claims several times here in San Diego. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:58 am
United States. [read post]
