Search for: "United States v. Certain Land and Interests in Property"
Results 101 - 120
of 620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2016, 1:47 pm
Khan v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 8:48 am
Land development in certain areas of Florida would come to a standstill. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 1:54 pm
Parker (Tribal Exhaustion) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html People in Interest of M.M. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:30 am
But that’s what happened in the Second Circuit’s decision Wednesday in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:03 pm
(the “Plaintiffs”) commenced an action against The Genoa Charter Township located in the state of Michigan (the “Defendants”) alleging a violation of their rights under the federal and state constitutions as well as the Religious Land Use and Institutional Persons Act (“RLUIPA”) when The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (the “district court”) dismissed certain claims… [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 10:01 am
(the “Plaintiffs”) commenced an action against The Genoa Charter Township located in the state of Michigan (the “Defendants”) alleging a violation of their rights under the federal and state constitutions as well as the Religious Land Use and Institutional Persons Act (“RLUIPA”) when The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (the “district court”) dismissed certain claims… [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
On remand, the State advanced various arguments in an effort to show that Amendment 2 was narrowly tailored to serve compelling interests, but the trial court found none sufficient. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 7:56 pm
The issue is whether the state, or littoral landowners, are entitled to ownership of certain accreted lands. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia August 19, 2011Briscoe v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 3:26 pm
Daly (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)United States, Osage Minerals Council v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California aptly explained in United States of America v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:33 pm
As noted again by Judge Rakoff: “In certain instances, the public’s interest in avoiding competitive exploitation or consumer confusion as to the source of a good outweighs whatever First Amendment concerns may be at stake. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 6:25 pm
The Tenth Amendment makes that explicit:The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.But then we also have the Ninth Amendment:The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.And the Fourteenth:... [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm
"); see also BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 477 (9th ed. 2009) (defining quitclaim deed as "[a] deed that conveys a grantor's complete interest or claim in certain real property but that neither warrants nor professes that the title is valid"). [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
United States, 290 U.S. 13 (1933) (allowing a property owner to directly bring a Fifth Amendment claim for compensation upon the taking of the property, without pursuing, for example, the state-litigation requirement as contemplated in Williamson County)[13]; First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:35 am
Verrilli, Jr., Munger Tolles & Olsen LLP (former Solicitor General of the United States): Once it had been determined that an invention qualified as IP, SCt will refer to private law notions and talk about the issues before the Court in property terms, as in Festo or Nautilus—use language of property right, drawing on private law concepts/analogy to the deed. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 6:42 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 6:39 am
State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 2:18 pm
Queensbridge Investments Limited v Lodge & Ors [2015] UKUT 635 (LC) There was quite a simple question at issue in this Upper Tribunal (Land Chamber) appeal – could the FTT appoint a manager to the whole of a building which contained a leased commercial unit as well as three leased residential units? [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:31 pm
Finally, the county (and in a similar vein, the United States as amicus) offered a multi-factor approach that would provide the least predictability, but the most flexibility to determine the interests of justice in any given case. [read post]
