Search for: "United States v. Collier" Results 101 - 120 of 121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2009, 3:28 pm
First, in 1972, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Furman v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:42 pm by chucknewton
"Any effort, action, or demand by a creditor to collect a pre-petition debt violates the automatic stay".Regardless of the stay violation, Paul Hill contended that he could not be sanctioned for his action of posting the sign because of his entitlement to exercise his free speech right under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, citing Turner Advertising Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
" The two dissenting judges (Erdmann & Ryan, JJ.) argued that the majority's approach was precluded by United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 5:15 pm
Audio to Wednesday's oral argument in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rowan, No. 05-30536 On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, a 60-month sentence of supervised release following a conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's sentence is a non-Guideline sentence since it falls outside the applicable range and was not based on an allowed departure; but 2) in light of the deferential standard set forth in Gall, there was no significant procedural error in the sentencing decision. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
I started in 1991 as a first year associate in the antitrust section at Collier Shannon Rill & Scott which, at the time, was perhaps the most prolific antitrust practice in the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
Horvath, Heller Ehrman LLP, New York, NY Highlights in competitor and consumer lawsuits: Axcan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 12:28 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice 'Han' Ruling Means That Statute is Constitutional Under Both First Amendment, Commerce Clause United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Young Moon, appeals from her conviction and sentence entered by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee on April 25, 2006, for three counts of health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0261p.06 2007/07/11 Parks v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
Seth at Quizlaw tells us that; Section 6103 of Title V of the United States Code reads, in relevant part: (a) The following are legal public holidays: … Memorial Day, the las [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression 12 v. (1946-1948) Office of United States Chief of Counsel. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 2:44 am
We have been unable to find a case in which this court has declared a state's inverse condemnation procedures to be inadequate, and in Collier v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 4:59 pm
We have been unable to find a case in which this court has declared a state's inverse condemnation procedures to be inadequate, and in Collier v. [read post]