Search for: "United States v. Costa" Results 101 - 120 of 306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2012, 10:52 am by Fred Abrams
 For example, a 2007 forfeiture complaint filed in United States, v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:24 am by Nassiri Law
It should also be noted, when comparing how California treats restaurant workers compared to other states with a lower minimum wage and tip offset credits, California, and especially Los Angeles, has one of the highest costs of living in the United States. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 7:27 am by South Florida Lawyers
Costa Crociere, S.P.A., 289 F.3d 1300, 1303 (11th Cir. 2002) ("[F]ederal courts, in the forum non conveniens context, do not focus on the connection between the case and a particular state, but rather on the connection of the case to the United States as a whole. [read post]
 The Court of Appeals found that “forcing Palmer to provide affordable housing units at regulated rents in order to obtain project approval [was] clearly hostile to the right afforded under the Costa-Hawkins act to establish the initial rental rate for a dwelling or unit. [read post]
 The Court of Appeals found that “forcing Palmer to provide affordable housing units at regulated rents in order to obtain project approval [was] clearly hostile to the right afforded under the Costa-Hawkins act to establish the initial rental rate for a dwelling or unit. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 1:26 am
Cummings Fordham International Law Journal, Volume 29, Number 4, April 2006 Philip V. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 10:05 am by trichard
Milpitas Unified School District v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:48 am by Jon Ibanez
The United States Supreme Court recently unanimously held in Riley v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
Cook, 09-cv-01732), proceeds from an alleged securities fraud might have been laundered across international borders and transferred into Switzerland, Panama, Costa Rica and the United Kingdom. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:45 am by Nassiri Law
On the other hand, the United Farm Workers (UFW) union is arguing the vote was manipulated and should not be counted, so it supports state efforts to block the vote from taking effect. [read post]