Search for: "United States v. David Cooper"
Results 101 - 120
of 631
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2011, 4:59 pm
Cooper v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis met with their Australian counterparts in Sydney today to demonstrate the United States’ commitment to the Asia-Pacific region at the annual Australia-United States Ministerial Consultations. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm
Jolynn Dellinger and Stephanie Pell argued that if Roe v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:57 am
A bit earlier, on November 20, 2009, Judge Goodwin entered Pretrial Order #47 by which it is was ordered that the following five Digitek federal court cases have been selected for trial: • David Kelch et al., v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 7:43 am
In this case, Aries Construction Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
United States (whether a district court may direct that a criminal defendant’s sentence run consecutively with a yet-to-be-imposed sentence that the defendant is expected to receive for a state crime). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
[iii] Just recently, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association reported that at the end of 2006 the derivatives market amounted US$283 trillion, an exorbitant amount when compared with the US$34 trillion resulting from the sum of the gross domestic product of the United States, the European Union, Canada, Japan and China. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 pm
On appeal, Plaintiff–Appellant the United States (`Government’) argues that reversal is necessary because the district court applied the wrong legal standard in determining that Krueger established prejudice.U.S. v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 8:39 am
House of Representatives v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
HORVATH & DAVID W. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
HORVATH & DAVID W. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 11:06 am
THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION GUARANTEES THE ACCUSED THE RIGHT TO COMPULSORY PROCESS FOR WITNESSES IN ITS DEFENSE. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 3:18 pm
This tort is recognized in the United States, but is untested in Canada. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:34 am
United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am
David S. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
Finding for the plaintiffs, the Court of Appeals of Indiana held: "we find that there was probative evidence that [cooperative’s] losses were due to a failure to hedge. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 12:55 pm
"Sealing of Sentencing Documents Relating to Defendant's CooperationIn United States v. [read post]
31 May 2006, 6:06 am
State v. [read post]
