Search for: "United States v. Democratic Executive Committee" Results 101 - 120 of 501
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
The second is the Office of the United States Trade Representative, which is in the Executive Office of the President. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 8:43 am by Steve Hall
As Justice John Marshall wrote in the landmark 1819 case McCulloch v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
In a crushing blow to consumers, on Thursday, February 21st, the United States Supreme Court again sided with big pharmaceutical medical device makers. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Jon May
Currently, Republicans have control of the legislative and executive branches in 22 states and the Democrats in 17, so it is likely that Trump would be on the ballot in at least 22 states.What happens if the other 17 states decide that he is disqualified and cannot be on the ballot? [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 3:41 pm
Contents include:Guy Goodwin-Gill, International Law Association (Australian Branch) Annual General Meeting AddressAnn Kent, Compliance v Cooperation: China and International LawDonald Keever, The Regulatory Coherence of Multilateral RegulationJo En Low, Engaging with the United Nations Treaty Bodies: A Fruitful Dialogue? [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Carol Nackenoff and Julie Novkov’s exhaustive account of United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:46 pm
 Article 2 situates the Central Committee between the National Congress and the Central Committee  and the Politburo and its Standing Committee elected by the Central Committee. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 7:24 am by Peter Shane
Where Kavanaugh and Gorsuch parted company with the majority was in their preference for applying the “demonstrated, specific need” standard of United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
   Rick aptly calls this “the most banana republic moment in the United States I could recall in two and a half decades of professionally following elections” (p. 66). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm by thejaghunter
The Tenth Amendment under full frontal Assault “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am by Michael Dreeben
That both the United States and Israel are wrestling with these fundamental questions makes this an opportune time to revisit them. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm by Josh Blackman
The President of the United States withdrew, and the Senate adjourned. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by J.S. Nelson
Democratic National Committee ruling—a dismantling that may be further accelerated through the Court’s upcoming decision in Merrill v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
This: All plaintiffs, as citizens of the United States, claim standing to maintain this action before the federal judiciary because the defendant legislative and executive branches have, by their formal actions, demonstrated that they are cooperating in a collective decision to deny the people constitutional governance carried out in decency and good order. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 8:23 am by Randy Barnett
I have been asked to make the case for the confirmation of the President's nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to sit on the Supreme Court of the United States, without regard to the questions raised after the close of his Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. [read post]