Search for: "United States v. Exxon Corp." Results 101 - 120 of 135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2009, 10:04 am
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
16 May 2009, 12:07 pm
 Recent case law emanating from the United States Supreme Court in the Exxon Valdez litigation supports the proposition that punitive damages should be limited to comport with the actual damages award. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Techdirt) (Hal Wegner) Reactions to Patent Reform Bill 2009 (IP Watchdog) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O)    Global Global - General World IP Day, 26 April, approaching (IPKat)  … [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 4:02 pm
The Supreme Court recently revisited the doctrine in Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP)   Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46)   Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46)   United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office)   United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance)… [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 4:49 pm
Exxon Corp., 275 F.3d 191, 200 (2d Cir. 2001). [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:40 pm
Exxon Mobil Corp., 2007-2371 (La. 7/1/08); ____ So. 2d ____. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:21 am
  Conference of June 12, 2008 __________________   Docket: 07-81 Name: Exxon Mobil v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 8:24 am
United Staffing Alliance Employee Medical Plan (CVSG 9/1/2007) (standard for judging denials of medical benefits by plan administrators) No. 07-81, Exxon Mobil v. [read post]