Search for: "United States v. Fries" Results 101 - 120 of 261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2018, 6:02 am
Despite their limitations, the Supreme Court cited both theories in one of its last major insider trading decisions, United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 5:34 am by Just Security
Russia-Ukraine Q&A on Russia-Backed Referendums in Eastern Ukraine and International Law by Eliav Lieblich (@eliavl) with Just Security Dealing with Putin’s Nuclear Blackmail by Ambassador Daniel Fried (@AmbDanFried) The Case for Creating a Special Tribunal to Prosecute the Crime of Aggression Committed Against Ukraine by Ambassador David Scheffer The Risks and Rewards of Planning for Ukraine’s Recovery Amid Ongoing War by Ray Salvatore Jennings (@raysjennings) US… [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 6:05 pm by Bridget Crawford
By Charles Fried | Volume 59 | Page 60 Transcendence: Conservative Wealth and Intergenerational Succession By Richard Delgado | Volume 59 | Page 44 Applying Rules of Discovery to Information Uncovered About Jurors By Thaddeus Hoffmeister | Volume 59 | Page 28 Footloose: How to Tame the Tucker Act Shuffle After United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:23 pm by Amy Howe
The Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Janus v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:51 am by Howard Wasserman
Charles Fried has it right in arguing that Citizens United's more-speech principle should support the Arizona law. [read post]
4 May 2007, 4:25 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 12:31 am
[17] Ina Fried, Microsoft Commentary Slams EU Ruling, CNet Networks, Aug. 22, 2004, [www.news.com] [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:14 am by Melody McDonald Lanier
Statistics show the imposition of the death penalty has sharply declined in the Lone Star state over the past two decades. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
Humphrey … with intent to subvert the authority of the Government of the United States, to hinder and delay the due execution of the laws of the United States, and to oppress and injure citizens of the United States, did unlawfully act as judge of an illegally constituted tribunal within said State, called the district court of the Confederate States of America, and as judge of said tribunal … then and there… [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:27 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice $500 Fine, Exceeding Forfeiture Amount, Probation Did Not Improperly Penalize Defendant's Trial Right United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
“No other nation,” Charles Fried has written, “claims as fierce and stringent a system of legal protection for speech. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 7:31 am by JB
The act was struck down by a conservative Supreme Court majority in United States v. [read post]