Search for: "United States v. Goodwill" Results 101 - 120 of 484
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
  Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 6:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
As alleged herein, NECA has advertised, promoted, and sold its goods under the “Quileute” name on the Internet and in various retail stores across the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
").Consider also a business model where the trademark owner manufactures in a foreign country and transfers title outside of the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 5:32 am
The Board found that the record evidence “readily establishes blatant misuse of the FLANAX mark in a manner calculated to trade in the United States on the reputation and goodwill of petitioner’s mark created by its use in Mexico. [read post]
Case date: 01 June 2020 Case number: No. 19-3395-cv Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:03 am
There is a fervent debate in the United States between proponents of gun rights, such as Applicant, and proponents of limitations on those rights. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:12 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Fla. 2003), involving a similar lunar pebble which had been gifted to the government of Honduras and was later smuggled into the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 3:02 am
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey issued a Final Judgment ordering the TTAB to "transfer" to Piano Wellness LLC the application of Charlotte K. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:43 am
However, many judges are unwilling to take this step for fear that the injunction order extends beyond what is necessary to strike the proper balance of competing rights. -- Court: United States District Court for the District of Nebraska Opinion Date: 7/2/09 Cite: Softchoice Corp. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 10:52 am
 On appeal, CCI argued that the arbitration award was irrational because it simultaneously revoked its license to open IMPROV clubs yet prevents it from opening any other comedy clubs throughout the United States until at least 2019. [read post]
21 May 2021, 7:31 am by Eugene Volokh
There is a fervent debate in the United States between proponents of gun rights, such as Applicant, and proponents of limitations on those rights. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.6(1) applied in all its force, and it followed from the reasoning of the Strasbourg Court in A v United Kingdom (2009) 49 EHRR as interpreted by the House of Lords in Secretary of State for the Home Department v F (2009) UKHL 28, (2009) 3 WLR 74 that the Treasury was obliged to afford the claimant bank sufficient disclosure to enable it to give effective instructions about the essential allegations made against it. [read post]