Search for: "United States v. Harrington"
Results 101 - 120
of 214
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2014, 8:57 am
United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
Harrington, 726 F.3d 921, 932 (7th Cir. 2013) (because "the state court’s decision denying post-conviction relief violated § 2254(d)[]," it was appropriate to consider de novo "the evidence presented at the federal evidentiary hearing"); Stitts v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
Bridges 13-657Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution allows States to tax goods distributed by out-of-state wholesalers more heavily than goods distributed by in-state wholesalers. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 9:28 am
When Hellman emphasized that this was “his last $75,000,” Justice Alito asked if Hellman knew the median net worth of a household in the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:05 pm
But Kozinski was dissenting in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:04 pm
United States, 13-113, involving the interaction of the strict construction canon for sovereign immunity and the interpretation of a separate statutory provision creating substantive rights. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:52 pm
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
United States, and perhaps implicating the twice-relisted Woodward v. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm
” The result is a sweeping rereading of American history that emphasizes the need to understand immigration and the United States in global perspectives. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
United States, Berghuis v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 8:30 pm
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
United States, 12-10638, is now most likely on hold for Robers; ditto Quince v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
Sims 12-1217Issue: (1) Whether the “hot pursuit” doctrine articulated in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
Sims 12-1217Issue: (1) Whether the “hot pursuit” doctrine articulated in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:33 pm
Alliance Resources Corp., a punitive damage award of $10,000,000 in a West Virginia slander of title case was upheld by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1269; and Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 6:07 am
Anne returned to the United States on February 15, 2011. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
