Search for: "United States v. James"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,930
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2023, 1:01 am
James Iredell, via The Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States (Artist: C. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 11:00 am
James M. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 3:35 pm
Reynolds, United States District Judge James Gritzner for the Southern District of Iowa declared Iowa Code § 717A.3, violated the First Amendment. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 9:53 am
But that’s exactly what happened in James v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 9:53 am
But that’s exactly what happened in James v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:44 am
In 2017 the United States applied to extradite him. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 10:45 am
State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 4:40 am
United States (previewed here) followed by one hour of argument in Burton v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 6:31 am
Last year, in State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:00 am
Last week at the Guantanamo military commissions, proceedings resumed in the case of alleged USS Cole bomber Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri. [read post]
1 May 2008, 5:24 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
In Pennington v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 11:11 am
[Post by Jake McGowan] United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 11:12 am
Secretary, Department of Corrections, United States District Judge Mary Scriven granted a writ of habeas corpus filed by James Guzman because the state failed to disclose a witness had been paid. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 4:50 pm
It has since been appealed to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 12:54 am
On this day in history, US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall, writing for a unanimous Court, ruled in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office are permanently enjoined from implementing the Final Claims and Continuations Rules. [read post]
