Search for: "United States v. John Daniels" Results 101 - 120 of 740
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Lucero; Eugene Volokh] “Innocent man spent months in jail for bringing honey back to United States” [Lynn Bui, Washington Post/MSN] Preakness, Peter Pan Inn, relocating USDA jobs, Baltimore and Abell Foundation in my new Free State Notes roundup; Pushing back against the argument, much circulated lately, that eviction is a major factor in causing poverty [John Eric Humphries, Nicholas Mader, Daniel Tannenbaum, Winnie van Dijk, Cowles… [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am by Erin Miller
The biggest news out of the Court yesterday was the opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:33 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
” Last month the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision of a California District Court Judge’s in the case John Doe I, et. al. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will consider whether a commercial fisherman violated the anti-shredding provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act when he destroyed several undersized fish. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:11 am by Conor McEvily
At Slate, John Paul Rollert discusses Justice Sotomayor’s lone dissent in last Term’s United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
United States, the case of a Pennsylvania woman who attempted to poison her husband’s paramour. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:00 am by Evan Lee
During Tuesday’s telephonic oral argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Progressive, Bill Blum considers the impact of Chief Justice John Roberts’ jurisprudence on voting rights in the United States. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 6:38 pm
United States District Judge, John Daniel Tinder, concluded that Wrinkles could not demonstrate prejudice because the jury was not aware of the stun belt. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 2:26 pm by Ilya Somin
September 14, noon to 1 PM, George Mason University, Scalia Law School, Arlington, VA: Debate on executive power over immigration, and United States v. [read post]