Search for: "United States v. John Lawrence"
Results 101 - 120
of 499
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
In 2013, the Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm
Laird and Marbury v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
Department of Justice (where she received the Attorney General’s Award for Exceptional Service – the department’s highest award for employee performance – as part of the team responsible for implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:38 am
Dagenhart and United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 11:22 am
The Godstone Farm is located in Redhill, Surrey, England, United Kingdom. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Connecticut or Roe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am
” In United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
United States, the court held 7-2 that to convict a defendant in U.S. illegally for violating a federal gun-possession law, prosecutors must show that defendant knew he was in the country illegally. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
United States CNN reports that Stormy Daniels has reached a settlement with Michael Cohen and Keith Davidson, her former attorney, in her lawsuit that accused both men of working together to protect President Donald Trump. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
United States, which asks when a defendant must have formed the intent required to commit burglary for purposes of a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act, comes from Rory Little. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am
E. coliO157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[4] The E. coli bacterium is among the most… [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
The PEW Research Group’s surveys of public opinion in the United States document the fundamental regime change that has taken place over the last half century. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
” One might compare this, ruefully, with the fact that not only Holder, but also his boss, the former President of the Harvard Law Review and a former member of the University of Chicago Law School faculty, never once offered an interesting observation about the United States Constitution and the vision presumably underlying it nor indicated any deep interest in molding the federal judiciary through judicial appointments. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
John O. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:17 am
United States, in which the justices considered whether a period of pretrial imprisonment can toll a term of federal supervised release, comes from Fiona Doherty. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
United States Postal Service, which asks whether the federal government can challenge patents under the America Invents Act, comes from Ronald Mann. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
The political economy of international standard setting in financial reporting: how the United States led the adoption of IFRS across the world. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:05 am
Emmerich and Robin Panovka, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 Tags: Antitrust, CFIUS, Cross-border transactions, Disclosure, Distressed companies, International governance, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, Securities regulation, Taxation Corporations are People Too (And They Should Act Like It) Posted by Kent Greenfield (Boston College), on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 … [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:43 am
United States, the justices ruled 5-4 yesterday that a state-law robbery conviction can qualify as a “violent felony” for the purposes of a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act even when the conviction does not require the use of violent force. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am
Wyoming, “an Indian treaty-rights case argued in the Supreme Court last Tuesday, revolves around a basic of federal Indian law: No promise to Indian people actually binds the United States. [read post]
