Search for: "United States v. Levinson"
Results 101 - 120
of 271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am
I do have some quibbles with Levinson’s discussion. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
United States, 294 U.S. 330 (1935); Nortz v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 6:43 pm
More than eight decades earlier (1833) in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 6:43 pm
More than eight decades earlier (1833) in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm
Mark Tushnet, Sandy Levinson and I are happy to announce that The Oxford Handbook of the United States Constitution is now available to order at https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-the-us-constitution-9780190245757? [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 11:00 am
United States — method of calculating restitution to victims of mortgage-loan fraud Wednesday, February 26: 12-1163 — Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:36 am
Amgen then filed a petition to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 3:51 pm
Antitrust doctrine in the United States and throughout the world is constantly adjusting to both economic and academic developments. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:03 am
United States: Good Faith, Retroactivity, and the Loss of Principle Brandon K. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
Levinson approach to materiality. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:01 pm
” Balkin says the two positions are ultimately symbiotic, since “dissensus about constitutional values—–the most characteristic feature of constituional Protestantism—is the great engine of constitutional change, shaping even that most ‘catholic’ of institutions, the United States Supreme Court” (97). [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Kansas (1887) and was the lone dissenter in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:42 pm
Levinson, 485 U. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
United States Office of Personnel Management (No. 10-00257). [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Sandy Levinson has argued that the Americans in 1776 were actually secessionists, not revolutionaries. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Youngstown and United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 6:19 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Article V, because it requires two-thirds of Congress and three-fourths of the states, is, as Sandy Levinson has put it, functionally dead. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
In Federalist No. 2, John Jay, writing of course as Publius, asserted that the Constitution had to be ratified, or else the unity of the United States, such as it was, would be lost. [read post]
