Search for: "United States v. New York Telephone Co" Results 101 - 120 of 237
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2016, 4:18 am by INFORRM
Second, in response to the safety criticisms in the New York Times article linking Pokémon Go to accidents caused by distraction, Hanke maintained that Niantic has been the only actor in the industry to disable its game when a user moves beyond a certain speed. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
  If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees,  you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 9:48 pm by Stephen Page
While the US has full faith and credit meaning allowing the portability of orders made in one particular part of the United States to take effect throughout the United States, each state has its own particular rules to do with family law and often there are different rules that apply from county to county. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
 The Legal Question: “Reasonable Technical Assistance” Under the All Writs Act Ever since the Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 10:11 am by Eric Caligiuri
New York Telephone Co., relied upon by the government, does not apply. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In Avon State Bank, David Gibson, a man who purported to be the son of a business associate of Ambrose Herdering, a customer of Avon State Bank, sought out the assistance of Herdering in moving the estate of Gibson’s deceased father from the Netherlands to the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, sorts out the issues involved in the battle between Apple and the government, in light of all the circumstances, including the February 29, 2016 opinion by Eastern District of New York Judge James Orenstein in the separate Apple iPhone unlocking case. [read post]
Rural Telephone Service Co, Inc. provides that a work only requires a “modicum of creativity” to be considered “original. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am by Podhurst Orseck
Wiener, co-chair of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act defense practice at Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 10:53 am
 This argument formed the basis of the dissent to one of the key cases the FBI relies upon,  United States v New York Telephone Co., 434 US159 (1977). [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
After the Supreme Court issued its decision last week in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:40 am by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
The New York Times writes that a confirmation of an attack on the plane “will only strengthen Mr. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 10:50 am by Francesca Procaccini
The burden analysis derives from the Supreme Court’s New York Tel Co. [read post]