Search for: "United States v. Norman" Results 101 - 120 of 368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2018, 1:36 pm by Kevin Russell
Kavanaugh acknowledges that “[i]ndependent agencies are constitutional under Humphrey’s Executor v. the United States” before adding that “what is constitutional is not always wise. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
” At Local 10 News, Bob Norman interviews Fane Lozman, whose First Amendment retaliatory-arrest suit the court revived this week in Lozman v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm by Carl Custer
The authors wrote, “The maximum observed log reduction of L. monocytogenes was 2.15 ± 0.04 for balsamic vinegar (50% (v/v)), 1.18 ± 0.06 for white wine vinegar ((50% (v/v)) and 1.13 ± 0.06 for acetic acid ((50% (v/v)). [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by J. Francisco Lobo
Though always mindful of the risk of disproportionate reactions, Ruys provides evidence (albeit not unequivocal according to him) that several states in addition to Israel have relied on this doctrine in the past, including the United States, Russia, China, Lebanon, Iran, Iraq, Liberia and Sudan. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by David Hartley
Jan. 10, 2018), the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied securities lawyer Norman T. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 1:35 pm by familoo
So, childrens' rights are significantly embedded in the family and difficult to separate from them (See The Christian Institute & Ors v The Lord Advocate (Scotland) [2016] UKSC 51 (28 July 2016) for an example of this in action, which Allan Norman wrote about on Pink Tape here). [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:44 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Partnership In 1981, Norman Roberts, Abraham Magid, and Abraham’s son, Lawrence Magid, formed 110 East 13th Street Associates (the Partnership) to own and operate a six-story, mixed-use commercial and 20-unit residential apartment building (the Building) in the East Village of Manhattan. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
 The Strasbourg Observers blog has a post about the Court of Human Rights’ admissibility decision in the case of Tamiz v United Kingdom. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 3:07 am by John Inazu and Burt Neuborne
When the Supreme Court extended the right of assembly beyond the federal government to the states in its unanimous 1937 decision, De Jonge v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am by SHG
United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 738 F.3d 885, 892 (8th Cir. 2013) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am by SHG
United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 738 F.3d 885, 892 (8th Cir. 2013) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:52 am
Furthermore, such a consequence is antagonistic to the bargain on which patent law is based wherein we ask inventors to give fulsome disclosure in exchange for a limited monopoly (British United Shoe Machinery Co. v. [read post]