Search for: "United States v. ONE ARTICLE OF DEVICE, ETC."
Results 101 - 120
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
Here’s a link to that article. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
-- Recent article no help answering that question. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
United States), parties can seek to reopen cases, etc. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
Richard Craswell’s great article on sports nicknames—crowdsourced. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
By itself, a single magazine article would be nothing of special note. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 10:10 am
(See her related law review article.) [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 9:07 pm
Chakrabarty, supra, at 308, quoting United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
The initial order should only be an interim one. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
One proposed approach to the issue of how policymakers, lawyers, armed forces, etc. should conceptualize accountability for technical autonomy in relation to war is war algorithms. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
However, doing so requires an understanding of 1) what a trade secret is, 2) where one finds a trade secret, and 3) how to appropriately protect a trade secret. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am
Part 2 will also discuss the financial motives of SEP holders—specifically, that licensing at the device level is far more lucrative because it provides outsized royalties. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 6:22 am
(For more on the complexities associated with weapons review for cyber capabilities, see this recent article in International Law Studies by Jeffrey Biller and Mike Schmitt.) 3. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 8:10 am
§ 2241(e)(2) takes that jurisdiction away insofar as it precludes jurisdiction over “any [non-habeas] action against the United States or its agents relating to any aspect of the detention, transfer, treatment, trial, or conditions of confinement of an alien who is or was detained by the United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 4:08 pm
Likewise, the United States Patent Office, through a procedure called Covered Business Method Review (“CBM”), has invalidated more than 80% of business method patents challenged under Alice. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 10:40 am
See a more detailed discussion of the different types of possession in our Possession of Stolen Property article here. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
(FamC (Jer) 22317-08-11 M.V. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
This link provides ample evidence about this from various news articles. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Dinwoodie: state of law or practice? [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
Celebrezze and Burdick v. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am
It says:"Whoever, being an officer or employee of the United States or of any department or agency ...publishes, divulges, discloses, or makes known in any manner or to any extent not authorized by law any information coming to him in the course of his employment or official duties ... which information concerns or relates to the trade secrets [etc...] confidential statistical data... [read post]
