Search for: "United States v. ONE ARTICLE OF DEVICE, ETC."
Results 101 - 120
of 163
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm
The Introduction to this article can be found in the July 5, 2014 posting on Rubin On Tax. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
United States), parties can seek to reopen cases, etc. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:43 pm
This is one of my most frequently used app. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:31 am
Shira Perlmutter, United States Patent and Trademark OfficeAt WIPO/multilaterally. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:45 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 2:49 am
I'm not going to do the usual preview post listing patents, products etc. before the trial in the second Apple v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am
On Wednesday (December 4, 2013), the Washington, DC-based United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will hold the long-awaited Oracle v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:03 am
The ECtHR accepted that most of the arrangements have resolved the article 3 (torture etc.) challenges, save for the case of Aswat v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Penn State Law, Course Descriptions. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am
[Also related is this article regarding efforts to install surveillance devices inside certain systems.] [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 5:15 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 8:17 am
The New Jersey court unanimously stepped up to say what Justice Sonia Sotomayor suggested in a lone concurrence in US v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
Co. (1933, Mont.) 26 P2d 175 [periodic immersion of injured hand into hot water]; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (1919 Neb.) 173 NW 689 [x-ray procedure requiring injection of contrast substance into the kidney]; Cardinal v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 10:10 am
(See her related law review article.) [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
However, doing so requires an understanding of 1) what a trade secret is, 2) where one finds a trade secret, and 3) how to appropriately protect a trade secret. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:02 am
A concurrence by Justice Sotomayor in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Pallin v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
" According to this article in Bloomberg, Mr. [read post]
