Search for: "United States v. Peters" Results 101 - 120 of 2,650
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm by Riann Winget
A federal judge in California blocked a Biden Administration rule that bars migrants who crossed into the United States from applying for asylum unless they entered the country at an official port of entry or obtained asylum protection in a different country. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
The decision clarifies that a technical effect may be plausible without requiring the provision of tests or data; this is precisely the opposite of what was decided by Judge Arnold in the United Kingdom. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am by Frank Cranmer
It explores the deaths of Peter Farquhar and Ann Moore-Martin in Buckinghamshire in 2014 and 2017 and the subsequent events including the police investigation and 2019 criminal trial of Ben Field. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 4:51 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
”  Similarly, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, in Lucky Cousins Trucking, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
Supreme Court amicus brief they filed, along with scholars Christopher DeMuth and Peter Wallison, in Biden v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 2:47 am by Mavrick Law Firm
As the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida explained in Furmanite Am., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
United States Secret Service, USSS Timeline of Jan. 6, 2021 (FOIA release on Jun. 29, 2021) 9. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm by David Pocklington
It will then treat the two (or more) people as a unit and treat the unit differently from how it would treat those same people individually. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm by admin
Recently, JAMA Network Open published an epidemiologic study (“Williams study”) that explored whether exposure to Agent Orange amoby ng United States military veterans was associated with bladder cancer.[1] The reported study found little to no association, but lay and scientific journalists described the study as finding a “link,”[2] or a “tie,”[3] thus suggesting causality. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:11 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Fla. 2019), the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida explained that what constitutes “outrageous” conduct is a question of law. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am by Frank Cranmer
The ET had erred in its approach because it had failed to engage with the question identified in Eweida and Ors v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8; had it done so, it would have concluded that there was a close or direct nexus between her Facebook posts and her protected beliefs. [read post]