Search for: "United States v. Rand"
Results 101 - 120
of 278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2012, 12:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:53 am
But, as the battle for Tikrit ramps up, the Wall Street Journal reports that the United States is walking back its plan to retake Mosul in April. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 1:39 pm
It draws its authority from the DNA Fingerprint Act of 2005, which granted the Attorney General power to direct federal agencies to collect DNA from “individuals who are arrested, facing charges, or convicted or from non-United States persons who are detained under the authority of the United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
Blocking measures have expanded to 39 countries in recent years, with the United States remaining the key absentee. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:28 am
Bilski and Rand A. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:42 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has already issued one ruling in Apple's favor against Google's Motorola (reversing and remanding an ITC ruling, which Google just asked it to reconsider), was clearly leaning Apple's way last month with respect to its continued pursuit of a permanent injunction against Samsung, and based on how today's appellate hearing on Judge Richard Posner's June 2012 dismissal of a two-way Apple v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 12:55 am
Motorola ruling is highly influential, Judge James Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington -- with support from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit -- has become the pioneer and thought leader in the U.S. with respect to the adjudication of FRAND licensing terms by federal courts through the substantive and procedural decisions has has already made in the Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
No other constitutional movement unites people as varied as Rand Paul and Bernard Sanders, Rush Limbaugh and Ralph Nader, Tea Party conservatives and the NAACP. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:59 am
Motorola and Judge Alsup in Oracle v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 12:22 pm
LAWSUITS: FANTASY V. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:00 am
Can we live in a UNITED States that is so disunited State by State? [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:19 am
National Collegiate Athletic Association, in which the court struck down the federal law that bars states from legalizing sports betting, is “a watershed moment that dramatically alters the landscape of the gaming industry in the United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
Concerning SEPs the Executive Order states: To avoid the potential for anticompetitive extension of market power beyond the scope of granted patents, and to protect standard-setting processes from abuse, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Commerce are encouraged to consider whether to revise their position on the intersection of the intellectual property and antitrust laws, including by considering whether to revise the Policy Statement on Remedies for Standards-Essential… [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
Concerning SEPs the Executive Order states: To avoid the potential for anticompetitive extension of market power beyond the scope of granted patents, and to protect standard-setting processes from abuse, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Commerce are encouraged to consider whether to revise their position on the intersection of the intellectual property and antitrust laws, including by considering whether to revise the Policy Statement on Remedies for Standards-Essential… [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 11:11 am
United States. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
Looking ahead to oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
