Search for: "United States v. Rang"
Results 101 - 120
of 7,350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2024, 8:56 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Thankfully, no Justice wrote to give any credence at all to the absurd arguments that the President isn’t an “officer of the United States” or that the presidency isn’t an office “under the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
ICON Health &Fitness, Inc., 572 U.S. 545, 553 (2014), and the text of the CTA is wide-ranging inscope. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 1:04 pm
This is the same mistake that the initial Fifth Circuit panel made in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
Rudnick v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 11:05 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
In relation to the transfer of Russian assets in particular, the United States has been reported as endorsing countermeasures adopted “by states ‘injured’ and ‘specially affected’ by [the Russian] aggression” against Ukraine. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
United States, the Court found the agency’s exclusion of the protester’s proposal from the competitive range was unreasonable.[5] In this case, the procurement had two phases. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The court invoked language from the Supreme Court’s 1968 decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:15 am
Section 280E refers to a provision in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of the United States. 280E has significant implications for businesses involved in the sale of controlled substances, including marijuana (or “cannabis” under Minnesota law). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:15 am
Section 280E refers to a provision in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of the United States. 280E has significant implications for businesses involved in the sale of controlled substances, including marijuana (or “cannabis” under Minnesota law). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
No state, let alone the United States, engages in diplomatic relations with the cartels, nor do the cartels purport to maintain diplomatic relations. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The Great Migration had produced important swing blocs of black voters in northern and border states who in 1930 shocked the nation with their demand that a nominee to the Supreme Court care about racial justice. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 7:33 am
Their expertise is grounded in a deep understanding of the First Amendment, which plays a central role in libel law in the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
They also furnish extensive and highly useful citations to a wide range of secondary sources. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:53 pm
Jenkins’s subscription to Westlaw includes both 50 State Statutory Surveys and 50 State Regulatory Surveys (found under Secondary Sources), with charts covering both state and federal law on a wide range of topics. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
New Relists McKesson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 4:38 pm
United States [read post]
