Search for: "United States v. Robert Walters"
Results 101 - 120
of 253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
Before sentencing, however, defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the basis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in R.A.V. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 4:38 pm
In one recent case, Bollea v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that the “theme out of the United States Supreme Court [yesterday was] materiality. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:35 am
At Letters Blogatory, Ted Folkman looks at the decision, noting that the opinion puts the state and federal courts in the United States “on the same page with the Special Commission of the Hague Conference, the US State Department, most if not all foreign courts, and more or less all writers on the subject. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm
Lastly, Wilkinson argued that the fact that Al Qaeda declared war on the United States should be given little weight. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:30 am
” As the district court noted in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:39 am
At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Walter Olson argues that today’s cases offer the court an opportunity to draw lines that will enable “the federal judiciary to police overreaching by state courts in their jurisdictional claims. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:14 pm
“I think that that’s unknowable,” Trivett says in reference to whether Baluchi will actually be housed at Camp VII, though Judge Pohl counters that it would be highly likely, especially given the travel ban for detainees to the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
A week ago today, I sat in the gallery of the United States Supreme Court with twenty North Carolina district court judges listening to Chief Justice John Roberts announce the court’s opinion in Endrow v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 11:36 am
Explaining this extreme form of deference, Justice Robert Jackson, author of the canonical Youngstown concurrence on separation of powers, observed in Harisiades v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm
Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
Gangi and Robert K. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:54 am
For example, federal courts always have jurisdiction over suits to which the United States is a party. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 11:16 am
United States and Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:54 pm
Under Crawford v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
The Court also spent significant time trying to figure out if Himmelreich’s Section 2680 argument runs contrary to the result in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 2:41 pm
What about Bush v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
The Supreme Court has even stated as much in its 1985 decision in Heckler v. [read post]
