Search for: "United States v. Sotomayor" Results 101 - 120 of 3,424
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2009, 10:38 am
  On the other hand, in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 5:19 am by SHG
When President Obama nominated then-Second Circuit judge, Sonia Sotomayor, to the Supreme Court of the United States, some of us were more than a little dubious about the selection. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:27 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, in which the Court held that trial courts could not impose longer criminal sentences for the purpose of rehabilitation. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:57 am
June 25, 2015 On June 18, 2015, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of King, et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 6:31 am by Howard Bashman
United States, No. 19–7862, Justice Sotomayor issued a dissent, in which Justices Stephen G. [read post]
28 May 2009, 12:53 pm
  For those who are interested in her sentencing jurisprudence, attention should be paid to Doug Berman's Sentencing Law and Policy blog, in which he (among other things) opened up an interesting discussion of Judge Sotomayor's opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:58 am
United States, 546 F.3d 450 (2008), acknowledged that their holdings were at odds with the decisions of seven other circuits, including the Second in Campusano. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:39 pm by Mike Gottlieb
United States, which today resolved a decade-old controversy regarding the constitutional distinction between two kinds of sentences: mandatory minimums and statutory maximums. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:24 am by Stina
On January 21, 2010, a divided United States Supreme Court ruled to overturn a century of legal precedent in the case Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 7:33 am by Derek T. Muller
Washington—and the per curiam opinion in Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:09 pm by Melissa Hughes and Christopher Bosch
S. ____, 2024 WL 478566 (2024), the United States Supreme Court (Sotomayor, J.) held that whistleblowers do not need to prove their employer acted with “retaliatory intent” to be protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:01 pm
In general, the False Claims Act authorizes private individuals who discover fraud against the United States to sue on its behalf. [read post]