Search for: "United States v. Sotomayor"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,437
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
The Free Speech Trifecta: How the Court Could Fundamentally Alter Free Speech in Three Pending Cases
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
In my forthcoming book, “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage,” I explore the evolution of free speech in the United States, including the failure of the Supreme Court to protect free speech during periods of political unrest. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:17 am
" But then in House v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
” Representing the United States, Assistant to the U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:14 am
V. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 9:11 pm
In the latest iteration of United States v. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The Sequel to Doe v. Mills: Justice Barrett Tightens The Screws On The Shadow Docket
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm
Today, the Supreme Court issued an order on the emergency docket in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:55 am
” United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Board of Education and United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 9:12 am
At the time, this was considered a direct application of the United States Supreme Court’s June 2022 decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
” As More described England, the United States also is “planted thick with laws, from coast to coast. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
The Colorado state trial court held that the President is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Thankfully, no Justice wrote to give any credence at all to the absurd arguments that the President isn’t an “officer of the United States” or that the presidency isn’t an office “under the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 7:27 am
The court heard oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:09 pm
S. ____, 2024 WL 478566 (2024), the United States Supreme Court (Sotomayor, J.) held that whistleblowers do not need to prove their employer acted with “retaliatory intent” to be protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
