Search for: "United States v. Standard Oil Company of California"
Results 101 - 120
of 193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am
” California: On May 14, 2012, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California issued a lengthy decision (Vance’s Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
” Click Here Railroad Company to Pay $4 Million Penalty for 2005 Chlorine Spill in Graniteville, SC. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The administrative order signed by the company requires it to follow a schedule of clean up agreed to by EPA and the company. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:53 am
Originally, it was used as a way to govern relations between nations, but now it is being utilized by human rights activists in order to hold corporations responsible for acts performed by their subsidiaries which infringe upon the rights of people in foreign nations in which the company resides. [1] The Act reads: “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the… [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:23 am
In the world of oil and gas, there are a lot of companies with debt maturities coming due in 2020 or 2021 (see this article from the Wall Street Journal discussing the $120 billion debt wall these companies will face through 2023), and oil prices have been below the break-even point for many drilling sites. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:25 am
District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed suits filed by the cities of Oakland and San Francisco against five oil companies over the costs of rising sea levels allegedly accelerated by the companies’ contribution to climate change. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm
The California Air Resources Board voted to update its Low Carbon Fuel Standard to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by promoting cleaner fuels—a shift that could raise gas prices in the state. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, July 2, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Comite Civico Del Valle,Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California: Comite Civico Del Valle, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Gulf Oil Corp., 597 F.2d 936 (5th Cir. 1979). [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Click Here California Companies Correct Environmental Violations, U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
But, more than two decades ago a federal court in Pennsylvania, applying Delaware law,[6] and a California appellate court[7] stated the BJR is not applicable to officers. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
” United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 1:18 pm
Brussels effect is a decision to conform private behavior to a single standard v. uncoordinated legal regimes following other regimes to convergence. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
”[7] By “traditional notions,” the Adopting Release refers to other SEC regulations and relevant Supreme Court case law (in particular, TSC Industries v. [read post]
Legalistic Lawlessness and the Strategic Use of Repudiated Supreme Court Precedents, Part One of Two
31 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
(This generation’s Korematsu, 2018’s Trump v. [read post]
Legalistic Lawlessness and the Strategic Use of Repudiated Supreme Court Precedents, Part One of Two
31 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
(This generation’s Korematsu, 2018’s Trump v. [read post]