Search for: "United States v. State of NY" Results 101 - 120 of 2,838
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am by Keith Szeliga and Daniel Alvarado
*     *     * [A]ny expense which is so necessary that absent its incurrence a contractor could not continue in business would automatically be held to benefit or bear an equitable relationship to Government contracts. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637, affd 35 NY3d 173; see Palmieri v Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Primavera, LLP, 200 AD3d at 785). [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:06 am by Robert Fuller
On Aug. 18, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an opinion in the long-running Marriott Data Breach MDL Litigation. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:02 am by Norman L. Eisen
Shawn Still (1:23-cv-03792) (civil removal proceedings) Mar-a-Lago (MAL): United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Griswold Prize by the Supreme Court Historical Society (NY City Bar). [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 12:36 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Natale v. 9199-4467 Quebec Inc., 2023 WL 4850531, No. 21-CV-6775 (JS)(SIL) (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 2:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
See also United States v Power, unpublished memorandum opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, issued January 9, 2023 (Case No. 20-po-331-GLS), 2023 WL 131050, and United States v Robertson, unpublished memorandum opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, issued January 9, 2023 (Case No. 22-po-867-GLS), 2023 WL 131051, *12 ("[T]he Court… [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
They want access to our markets without being held responsible for the damage they are causing to consumers here in the United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Similarly, petitioner's newly-asserted New York State unspecified constitutional religious freedom argument may not be considered for the first time on reargument, and, in any event, it is unavailing (see Kane v De Blasio, 623 F Supp 3d 339 [SD NY 2022] [City policy requiring workers in school settings to be vaccinated not unconstitutional]). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Similarly, petitioner's newly-asserted New York State unspecified constitutional religious freedom argument may not be considered for the first time on reargument, and, in any event, it is unavailing (see Kane v De Blasio, 623 F Supp 3d 339 [SD NY 2022] [City policy requiring workers in school settings to be vaccinated not unconstitutional]). [read post]