Search for: "United States v. Sweet" Results 101 - 120 of 418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2009, 9:30 pm
"This case involves the authority of the federal district courts to assist litigants before foreign tribunals with the production of evidence in the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
The operative portion of Senator Specter's bill is short and sweet: Except as otherwise expressly provided by an Act of Congress or by an amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which takes effect after the date of enactment of this Act, a Federal court shall not dismiss a complaint under rule 12(b)(6) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, except under the standards set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Conley v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:25 am by Eric
If SOPA had passed, undoubtedly we would have seen an increase in enforcement actions between two foreign litigants without real ties to the United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
In the Amalfitano case, the Amalfitano's attorneys reference legislation promulgated in 1275.The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit certified two questions to the Court of Appeals concerning the application of Section 487 of the Judiciary Law insofar as it provides that:"[a]n attorney or counselor who: . . . is guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party . . . [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by SHG
This title phrase, glommed from the non-precedential decision of the Third Circuit in State Troopers v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 11:10 am by Nicholas Mosvick
United States, upholding the internment of Japanese-Americans by a 6-3 decision. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:19 am by Sheldon Toplitt
phonedog (Photo credit: Brad Weikel)In a 13-page complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging misappropriation of trade secrets, conversion and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, a Delaware corporation based in Mt. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:28 am by The Docket Navigator
United States Patent and Trademark Office et al., 1-09-cv-04515 (NYSD March 29, 2010, Opinion) (Sweet, J.) [read post]