Search for: "United States v. Tam"
Results 101 - 120
of 916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2015, 10:38 am
The United States government is a huge entity that cannot possibly be aware of every instance of fraud of which it is a victim. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 10:38 am
The United States government is a huge entity that cannot possibly be aware of every instance of fraud of which it is a victim. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:56 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:05 pm
Circuit's decision in United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
Wetherholt and Drimer v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 11:45 pm
The United States moved, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 11:32 pm
In United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 4:44 am
United States, SCOTUS zapped the incentive of qui tam relators to disclose fraud against the federal government under the Federal False Claims Act. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 7:01 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 7:29 am
According to Senator Grassley, through the 2024 Fiscal Year, the United States has recovered more than $78 billion from FCA actions, the majority of which came from qui tam actions brought by relators. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:22 pm
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Petitioner v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:22 pm
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Petitioner v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 1:27 am
Judge Polster reviewed the long history of qui tam actions in the United States, and noted that the Supreme Court, in Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 11:39 am
United States, 318 F.3d 250 (D.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:22 am
" United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 7:43 am
In Lusby v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 2:40 pm
Hayling v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:00 am
On August 31, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Stauffer v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 7:56 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 12:47 pm
A federal appeals court recently held, in United States v. [read post]
