Search for: "United States v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon"
Results 101 - 120
of 787
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
District Court Judge Amit Mehta. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 3:15 pm
Oregon Dep't of Agric. (2008) (stating that the government "could not generally prohibit or punish, in its capacity as sovereign, speech on the ground that it does not touch upon matters of public concern"); Connick v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 5:40 pm
"The appellant, in his capacity as a district taxpayer, filed suit in a State court challenging the right of the Board to reimburse parents of parochial school students. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 3:49 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 1:27 pm
Oregon State Bar, the justices are asked to review the use of mandatory attorney dues by the Oregon State Bar to fund political and ideological speech. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:30 pm
District court: Which is unconstitutional. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Additionally, the LCRR has been challenged in court by the Natural Resources Defense Council, Newburgh Clean Water Project, NAACP, Sierra Club, United Parents Against Lead and the Attorneys General of New York, California, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Additionally, the LCRR has been challenged in court by the Natural Resources Defense Council, Newburgh Clean Water Project, NAACP, Sierra Club, United Parents Against Lead and the Attorneys General of New York, California, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia. [read post]
25 May 2021, 2:55 am
GILTI is meant to ensure that, regardless of where a U.S. company does business in the world, its foreign subsidiaries pay at least a minimum rate of income tax, if not to other countries, then to the United States. [read post]
21 May 2021, 11:36 am
District Court in Portland, Oregon in Doe v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 4:59 pm
Black sites and state secrets In United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
Thirty-five states and the District of Columbia use ad valorem taxes; only seven states assess a flat surcharge; and two states levy both an ad valorem tax and a flat-dollar surcharge. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm
[Waters of the United States, stolen gift cards, and Hester Prynne.] [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:04 am
Most recently, in Citizens United v. [read post]
