Search for: "United States v. Wearing" Results 101 - 120 of 1,906
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2009, 11:17 pm
Iqbal, the United States Supreme Court confused the law of supervisory liability. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am by Bob Farb
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am by Bob Farb
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:23 am
United States, the Supreme Court wrestled with how to make sense of what went on behind closed doors in a jury deliberation that produced several acquittals but also deadlocked on other factually related counts. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 1:16 pm
We next reject Wear's contention that our decision is controlled by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Welsh v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:29 am by Larry
United States is a case about the classification of used clothing coming into the United States.The plaintiff imported bales of used clothing and classified the merchandise in HTSUS item 6309.00.00 as "worn clothing," which is a duty free. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Supreme Court has unanimously rejected a claim that people working for United States Steel are entitled to compensation for the time spent dressing for work. [read post]