Search for: "United States v. Windsor"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,003
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2018, 9:04 am
Gay Rights: United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:13 am
United States, in which he joined with the liberals to adopt a narrower (yet still "conservative") outcome may be a sign of things to come. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:45 am
United States and Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:30 pm
Texas, United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:33 pm
” In 2013, Kennedy would provide the key vote and write for the court in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:45 pm
'” On June 26, 2013, a divided Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:13 am
Windsor and Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:44 pm
In 2013, James Yudes wrote a blog about the decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:44 pm
In 2013, James Yudes wrote a blog about the decision in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:00 pm
In the United States, our laws are enacted by our elected representatives. [read post]
17 May 2018, 3:15 am
In legal and constitutional terms, Meghan Markle is a natural-born United States citizen. [read post]
9 May 2018, 6:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 4:05 am
From SSRN:Mary Nobles Hancock, God Save the United States and this Honorable County Board of Commissioners: Lund, Bormuth, and the Fight Over Legislative Prayer, (76 Wash. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 8:35 pm
Windsor). [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:32 am
Kaplan successfully argued for Edie Windsor in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
Texas, United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:20 am
The Internal Revenue Service (hereinafter the IRS) disallowed the deduction, resulting in years of litigation before the United States Tax Court, which ultimately ruled in favor of the IRS. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
” Judge Watson’s analysis reminds me of a colloquy in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 1:43 pm
” CMS has withdrawn a December 12, 2014 proposed rule to revise selected conditions of participation (CoPs) for providers, conditions for coverage for suppliers, and requirements for long-term care (LTC) facilities to conform with the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]